Tourney Documentation Overview

Each page describes a problems tourney arranged by or conducted through one source.

In a few cases, the tourneys were announced, commenced, but actually not finished. If they were reasonably well publicized, they will documented as normal tourneys.

In other cases, they may have been in early stages of planning, briefly mentioned in public media, but never realized or announced. In such cases, they will probably be documented separately together with similar cases.

For each individual tourney, the following information is normally present:

Title. Should include the arranger, if known. (The arranger is normally the person or organization that has some degree of responsibility to ensure that announced prizes exist.) Tourneys are often arranged by newspaper columns or chess periodicals. Tourneys arranged as part of a chess congresses should include the congress name.


What did the arrangers asks from participants?

'Standard requirements' are sometimes omitted. They are:

Problems must be originals and unpublished.
Only direct mates are allowed. No self-mates or problems with conditional stipulations.
... say something about motto system

If the tourney is divided into sections, they are indicated as follows:

requirements for section a
requirements for section b
Closing date

At what date must the submissions have reached the arrangers? This is always the date/dates stated in the announcement, regardless of specific conditions. One tournament may say that problems must have reached the organizer on a certain date, or it may say that they must have done so before a certain date, or even that they must be postmarked not later than the closing date.

Who decided the outcome of the tourney, and how? Were there any special directives from the arrangers regarding judging?
Awards, formal and sometimes informal

This information covers at least the formal prizes specified in the Requirements section. If known, the mottos used by the competitor is included here.

If the requirements contains sections, so do the awards.

Source references should be full and specific: it should preferrably be possible to go straight to the page from which the information was taken.

Any additional information or observations.

Prize-winning problems follow, with diagrams, and any additional details, to the extent that they are known. Non-prize-winning awards (i.e. honorary mentions, etc.) are normally not included.