Competition for the additional pr. required a fee of 5 shillings.
Judges: Rev. C. E. Ranken, H. Turton, W. Grimshaw, Kling, Horwitz, Falkbeer.
Umpire: S. Angas.
|pr.||C. Bayer (motto: All is well that ends well)|
|add. pr.||F. Healey (Palmam qui meruit ferat)|
|sp. m.||Graf Pongraz & C. Bayer (Jeder thut sein Bestes)|
|sp. m.||F. della Torre (Matt ohne Ehrmatten)|
|sp. m.||G. Campbell (The Author’s Dream)|
|sp. m.||R. Willmers (W.)|
|sp. m.||A. Novotny (A---N.) (see notes)|
Additionally, five sets were reported to be eligible for the additional prize: All’s well that ends well, W., Palmam qui meruit ferat, G---e and Pre-Raphaelite.
After almost all the judges had given in their decisions, an error was discovered in one of the problems of one of the best sets. This necessitated further communication with the Judges, and a reconsideration of their opinions, and thus much time was consumed.(Era, Jan. 11, 1857)Rev. Ranken discovered that one of the problems in the set Palmam qui meruit ferat was faulty: the solution provided by the author was not possible. This raised the question if the author had complied with requirements; judges eventually decided that he had, but most of them agreed that the set could no longer be a candidate for the first prize.
The offending problem is Healey’s problem 2 below. While it has a solution in the stipulated number of moves, it was not the solution provided with the set. (The author's solution does not appear to be known.)
After the publication of the final report, Healey objected to what he interpreted as an attempt by the Era chess editor to underrate the merit that the judges had assigned him, and consequently declined the prize awarded him. In response The Era printed relevant extracts from the Judges decision, as far as they bore on Healey’s protest, followed by a response from the editor himself. No further information about this controversy has been found, and it is not mentioned in the tournament book. As Healey prints his Era award problems as the first six problems in his collection published in 1866, it may be assumed that the matter was settled.
The report by Silas Angas lists the names and the mottos of all 16 competitors. It does not entirely match the mottos listed in the preliminary report, as two mottos from the former (Böse menschen &c.; Die Launen des Geschicks &c.) do not appear in the preliminary report, and vice versa: two mottos in the preliminary report (Emden; Pr. 1) do not appear in the final.
Another motto is also reported inconsistently: R. Willmers’s set is listed as W. in preliminary and final reports; as A kingdom for a horse! in the tournament book.
In addition to the awards, five competitors were given special mentions in the report. The fifth competitor, A. Novotny, was already excluded for not sending the required number of problems (see the preliminary report), so his appearance in the award list is unexpected.
One of the problems in the (excluded) set from A. Novotny was published by mistake in Illustrirte Zeitung, v. 28, i. 711 (1857-02-14), p. 146. The error was acknowledged and explained in the following issue.
A problem from an unpublished set (probably the set Gutta cavat lapidem &c. by Leopold Zahn, Tübingen) was published in The Field, 1859-03-19, p. 226.
… in order to provide this second prize, we propose that an entrance fee of 5 shillings be paid by the competitors themselves; this second prize can only be awarded to the second best composer among those who may contribute. The payment of an entrance fee is quite optional on the part of the competitors. Those who contribute will have the advantage of competing for two prizes [...] those who do not contribute [will compete] only for the first prize.This additional prize is usually referred to as "2nd Prize", and so gives the impression that it was awarded under the same conditions as "1st Prize". But as contenders for this prize had to pay a fee and were not eligible for the 1st prize, the term "additional prize" is used here instead.
AwardsThe diagrams appear in the same order and with the same numbers as in the problem tourney book.
Prize: C. Bayer
Key: 1. Bh5
Key: 1. Bc4
Source: The Era, v. 29, i. 962 (1857-03-31), p. 14, prb. 151
Key: 1. Rg5
Key: 1. Nh5
Key: 1. R8g6
Key: 1. Nxc6+
Source: The Era, v. 29, i. 956 (1857-01-18), p. 13, prb. 144
Additional Prize: F. Healey
Key: 1. Qc6
Source: The Era, v. 29, i. 959 (1857-02-08), p. 15, prb. 148
Key: 1. Qxd1 [see notes]
Source: The Era, v. 29, i. 962 (1857-03-01), p. 14, prb. 152
Key: 1. Rd8
Key: 1. Qg5
Key: 1. Ne6
Key: 1. Qd8
Source: The Era, v. 29, i. 956 (1857-01-18), p. 13, prb. 145